(*) In Risk Management, the Probability that a hazard will occur is balanced with the Severity of the likely injury to determine the risk involved, then Controls are added to help mitigate either the likelihood that it will occur, or to lessen the severity if it does. If Blazer choses to address this issue I will certainly re-evaluate their Blazer Brass line of ammunition for future classes, and if any other brands of ammunition prove to be problematic they will be included here as well. After this incident, I found three other on-line references to Blazer Brass ammunition suffering from jacket separation (whereas I generally take anything posted to a blog with a heavy dose of salt, the initial response I received from Blazer was nearly verbatim to one of those posted, which adds to its veracity). However, at this time I have not seen any evidence of those particular brands experiencing jacket separation out of the muzzle in non-ported firearms, and they will continue to be allowed until they prove to have this same issue. ![]() ![]() USE" and "NOT FOR USE IN PORTED FIREARMS" warnings that are found on the Blazer Brass box. It should also be noted that there are other ammunition manufacturers that utilize the thin copper plating, and have the same "NOT FOR L.E.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |